European Standards of Judicial Governance: From Soft Law Standards to Hard Law
- Sprache:
- Deutsch
- Jahrgang:
- JRPBand 30
- Inhalt:
- Abhandlung
- Umfang:
- 8924 Wörter, Seiten 491-501
30,00 €
inkl MwSt
This article aims to describe the effect of the ever-expanding case-law of ECtHR and the CJEU on domestic judicial design and its connection to judicial independence. The right to a fair trial and the right to effective remedy, which are fundamental parts of both legal order, has been interpreted in recent times as a yardstick to evaluate the national judicial system, which also leads to an empowerment of the judges and enforcement of soft law standards. These new instruments were established especially to protect judges in illiberal or transitional democracies but they seem to be more and more relevant for established democracies as well.
- Kosař, David
- Vincze, Attila
- selection of judges
- preliminary reference
- Art 19 TEU
- Art 7 TEU
- Art 267 TFEU
- Art 325 TFEU
- Art 2 TEU
- primacy of EU law
- judicial governance
- Art 6 ECHR
- democratic backsliding
- JRP 2022, 491
- effective remedy
- Art 53(3) CFR
- fundamental values of the European Union
- judicial independence
- ECHR
- principle of non-regression
- Rechtstheorie, -geschichte
- Art 47 CFR
